“It is unjustifiable that students have to cut their allowances to access them and be able to live in a country where the cost of living is already high,” said Sezoe.
“It is unacceptable that NSFAS is charging students they ought to serve. It is unacceptable, hence we will await the outcome of the investigation and the public protector must make sure education funds are protected.”
Speaking to TimesLIVE, the public protector’s office said it was investigating the matter.
“The public protector confirms receipt of the complaint. The matter was registered on July 14 and has been allocated to an investigator,” it said.
The office would not disclose the measures that would be taken, saying: “The investigation is ongoing. Accordingly, the Public Protector Act prohibits the disclosure by any person of the contents of any document or record of any evidence given before the public protector or deputy public protector during an investigation.”
TENET South Africa distanced itself from the matter, saying it was taking Tenet Technology to court over the use of its name.
“We’ve learnt NSFAS has contracted a company called Tenet Technology to provide a NSFAS bank card. Despite the apparent similarities in name and logo, we have nothing to do with Tenet Technology or the provision of payment cards to NSFAS,” said TENET South Africa.
“Given our long-standing association with the higher education sector and NSFAS, the choice of name is unfortunate. It is already confusing students, universities and others. While TENET provides connectivity solutions to NSFAS through the SANReN network, we did not respond to tender of direct payments of allowances to NSFAS students. Nor are we associated with any of the successful bidders in that tender.”
TimesLIVE reported NSFAS spokesperson Slumezi Skosana said the main objective in NSFAS taking over direct payment was to ensure accountability on student allowances and to establish a better co-ordinated system for the transfer of funds to students.
Skosana said NSFAS expected the new system to be convenient for students and provide allowances in a manner that is dependable and predictable.
“There were several universities that [engaged] service providers in dispensing student allowances. NSFAS would bear no direct accountability for the action of the service providers nor the universities concerned,” he said.
TimesLIVE
Support independent journalism by subscribing to TimesLIVE Premium. Just R20 for the first month.
.
